![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjYzgNVITeNE8Kt5U99KBnIctUj05XFYLerXQcx6yIPxD1C0oT9cG7KJhdW1-LRLjqFeZQxnkoDyML3iLuEHd98yaWIb16_s2RSL2m2VV7mg0OQ6esRTjlKdlJL8wyQkwW-iWBuFQ/s200/100_0195smallervoteyesbrandywinereferendumsign.jpg)
Those against only had our rants in the comment section of the News Journal online (scary), a few random blogs, and word of mouth.
One comment on the New Journal website put it succinctly and perhaps demonstrates the need for better math education anyway -
"The district asked for $8.9 million spread over three years rather than the $12.6 million over five years in the first vote."It seems that the voters approved an even greater increase in funding than the first one we voted down.
While the overall amount approved ($12.6M vs $8.9M) is nearly a 30% decrease, if you look closer, you'll see that is very clever reporting by the Journal:
$8.9 million over three years equates to $2,966,000 a year.
$12.6 million over five years equates to $2,520,000 a year.
I guess ya places yer bets and ya takes yer chances.
No comments:
Post a Comment